Filed under: "red mountain park", 2007 predictions, 2007 resolutions, AL, Alabama Politics, beta testing, Birmingham, Birmingham Alabama, Commentary, music, News Media (as source & subject), Race and Prejudice, Snap Preview Anywhere, Social commentary, The Ticker, The Year in Review, urban issues, urban parks
Happy New Year to those that have taken the last few days to relax and enjoy yourselves. Here are a few links to some of the posts made in the last week, including a look back at the year that was and a look towards this one:
You may also notice as you pass over the links contained within posts throughout the blog that a small screen is beginning to pop up. Dre’s Ramblings is one of the beta testing sites for a new feature being offered by WordPress.com called Snap Preview Anywhere, or SPA. It’s a service of one of the newer search engine services, Snap.com. If any of you have any opinions or comments about what you think about it, please let me know so I can pass it on to the support team.
Thanks; now a short list today:
Robinson’s comments may lead to action
State legislator Oliver Robinson’s comments are bound to rub some of Birmingham’s Black community the wrong way when they are read this morning.
Blacks must act to emancipate selves, legislator says, The Birmingham News, 1.2.2007
Either that or there will be an voice that raises up in agreement with them, though many will not be sure just how to solve the issue of supporting local businesses. The issue exists with small businesses in general, when individuals are not quite sure what is available in their own back yard. Perhaps the words spoken by Robinson and others will lead to a longer discussion and solutions.
What to do now about the parks projects?
A recent decision by our national legislators threaten the future of several parkland projects throughout the state.
Earmark plan harms parks, The Birmingham News, 1.2.2007
There were many that were counting on the money for acquisition costs, most notably Red Mountain Park (talked about here). This recent wrinkle in plans and hopes for planners may finally weigh the true public sentiment for the park. It could provide a chance for the community to demonstrate its desire to have this facility constructed for them as its primary purpose instead of focusing on rankings among other cities per capita. The development of all three major park projects should be first and foremost for the betterment of its citizens. Hopefully, that will drive the future of the projects instead of prestige, especially when you consider the size of parks that serve similar purposes in larger cities.
3 Comments so far
Leave a comment